User talk:2607:FEA8:20A4:5A00:C899:35CD:9EA4:27D8

February 2023
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Japan–South Korea relations, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 14:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia
You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed. S Philbrick  (Talk)  20:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)