User talk:2607:FEA8:E91F:1600:741C:C8BD:E970:2AAD

September 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sovereignty, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Riverbend21 (talk) 13:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

OK great, however removing belief/ religion from the "social construct" discourse/ framework , implies a secularization thesis. As few earthlings 14% https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism#:~:text=A%202002%20survey%20by%20Adherents,atheists%22%20at%20about%2014%25.

are "secular", the secularization of the discourse can be understood as a form of secular cultural domination ( not good). If you have a suggestion as to the use of language that can be more inclusive regarding terms like "social Construct" terms that invite broader understandings of personhood into the discourse please help me out. All the best.