User talk:2610:148:1F02:7000:E4C6:25E7:D043:1086/talk page tutorial

Article evaluation

Evaluating Content The artical about Lois Graham is relevant to the article's topic, with no distractions. The sources look up to date, being retrieved in 2018. In my opinion, there is nothing that could improved - it was short and to the point.

Evaluating Tone It was a neutral article, telling us about her life and how she was educated. Maybe the early life and education was underrepresented.

Evaluating Sources One of the links did not work, but the rest checked out and supported the article. One link could be classified as bias because it was titled "In Honor: Lois Graham" which probably only tells the important, outstanding part of her life.

Talk Page The was only one comment on the talk page telling us about what like did not work for her. The article is rated B-class and looks like it apart of Women's History, Engineering, and Woman scientists, but it has low-importance. It is different from the way we talked about in class by having less comments and edits.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lois_Graham