User talk:2620:132:B08A:0:40D4:717D:75EB:64AE

April 2019
Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to German Americans have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 04:54, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Pope Clement XII. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:19, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 * As further information, please see What Wikipedia is not and Verifiability. Wikipedia is not a forum, blog, soapbox, fan site, message board, advice site, advertising vehicle or tabloid. It is an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not publish rumors, gossip, personal opinions, personal experiences, messages, commentary, advocacy, complaints, advice, joke edits, promotional material, original research or unsourced information likely to be changed, challenged or disputed. See also Biographies of living persons, Five Pillars, Identifying reliable sources, Citing sources, Help:Footnotes, No original research, Manual of Style/Words to watch and Neutral point of view. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Referencing for beginners; Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:20, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I have seen your comment. Wikipedia certainly welcomes factual additions to articles, although these usually must be referenced. They cannot be in the form of opinions, unsourced and debatable text or commentary. A reliable, verifiable, third party source can support facts that may otherwise appear questionable, as I have explained above. You will find that my comments are from the Wikipedia pages noted and that those pages can provide further guidance. This is not a commentary or judgment on your editing. You certainly appear to me to be in good faith so I do not think your efforts are vandalism, but that does not mean they need not comply with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Donner60 (talk) 04:27, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Further reply on my talk page. Donner60 (talk) 04:42, 5 April 2019 (UTC)