User talk:27.109.113.101

June 2024
Hello, I'm CardboardLamp. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Ang Mey have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. CardboardLamp (talk) 15:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ang Mey, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. AntiDionysius ( talk ) 15:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. You saying sourced content is fake, is not an adequate explanation for removing it. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. signed, Willondon (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Ang Mey. AntiDionysius ( talk ) 15:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Foreigners, like those who have been falsifying Cambodian history for years, don't you think it affects?
 * If you think content on Wikipedia should be changed drastically, talk to other editors about it rather than trying to force your preferred version through by repetition. You will also need to provide reliable sources for your proposed changes. Calling people "uneducated", accusing them of deliberately "falsifying" things when they have a different view than you, or repeatedly making reference to how they're "foreign" - none of these things are useful, constructive, or - in the long term - allowed on Wikipedia. -- AntiDionysius ( talk ) 16:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)