User talk:27.33.158.15

April 2018
Hello, I'm Newslinger. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Ubuntu (operating system), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Newslinger (talk) 12:13, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ubuntu (operating system), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Newslinger (talk) 13:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ubuntu (operating system). Newslinger (talk) 13:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ubuntu
Just run:  for source code. Septrillion (talk) 00:41, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Useless for people not running Ubuntu, thus making the source code only accessible by a proprietary means, therefore is not open source. Also, that appears to be for one package only.

April 2018
Your recent editing history at Ubuntu (operating system) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. theinstantmatrix (talk) 01:18, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

There is no 'edit war'. I am just correct incorrect information. How about you learning about computers more?

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 01:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. You have broken our edit warring rules by reverting 17 times at Ubuntu (operating system). You seem to believe that Ubuntu is not open source. It is not a fault of Ubuntu that they choose to package their open source code inside Git repositories. If you are not familiar with Git, you can ask for assistance at Reference desk/Computing. EdJohnston (talk) 02:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Firefox. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eihel (talk) 03:28, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Firefox, you may be blocked from editing. 'Everything is on https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/, but you know that you vandalize anyway ! When it's not Ubuntu, it's Firefox, follow the references !' Eihel (talk) 03:59, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Firefox&oldid=864885576. Eihel (talk) 04:58, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.