User talk:27.5.116.243

July 2022
Hello, I'm Pulpfiction621. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Vadivelu have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 19:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)


 * define constructive 27.5.116.243 (talk) 19:26, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * the problem with most of you people is just because someone hasn't logged in, you brush aside the importance of certain edits.
 * the fact the actor Vadivelu targeted the actor Vijaykanth in an extremely derogatory manner is salient, and reported widely across publications. it is further important considering Vadivelu voluntarily didn't show up in public for a considerable period of time after the election results showed Vijaykanth's sweeping victory. the subsequent ban on the former only happened later on.
 * well whatever, just a waste of time having to type all this. you're probably some idiot fan boy who doesn't want to besmirch his god. 27.5.116.243 (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Even I too know also about that controversy, but Wikipedia has certain rules. Whenever you are adding an actual fact you need to provide a reliable source for that. You can also refer WP:RS so that you get familiar with our policies and guidelines. It’s better to ask User:Pulpfiction621 who reverted your edit in his talk page. You can ask here —-> User talk:Pulpfiction621 Theoder2055 (talk) 05:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC)


 * waste of time 27.5.116.243 (talk) 18:49, 11 July 2022 (UTC)