User talk:27.62.68.149

January 2023
Hello, I'm Xnet1234. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Manju Warrier have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Xnet1234 (talk) 22:28, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * You don't have to do that. Am also editor like you. Sources given all are not valid or reliable hence i edited it. Please mind your job 27.62.68.149 (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Manju Warrier shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Please discuss the changes on the article talk page. The 3RR limit is a bright-line rule, and you are past it at this point. Any further reverts without consensus at the article talk page will be reported to the edit-war noticeboard. You need to use the article talk page and seek consensus for your changes.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 23:19, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Also, please don't leave messages like "Donot undo my edits" for other editors, as you did here. That's not helpful and contrary to Wikipedia's philospophy.  As long as they are an editor in good-standing, there isn't necessarily a problem with them undoing your edits (or anyone else's).  Please read WP:BRD.  Ravensfire  (talk) 23:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Eswaran Naveen. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)