User talk:27bchao

October 2021
Hello, I'm Robertjamal12. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to La Folia Barockorchester have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   Robertjamal12   (talk)  11:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at La Folia Barockorchester. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC) I am unwilling {unblock|reason=Your reason here 27bchao (talk) 13:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)} {unblock|I will stop=Your reason here 27bchao (talk) 13:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)} You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at La Folia Barockorchester. My Pants Metal (talk) 12:00, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: La Folia Barockorchester was changed by 27bchao (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865954 on 2021-10-29T11:58:55+00:00

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --   LuK3      (Talk)   12:07, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

One open unblock request at a time, please. You had three. Just to be clear, you are rejecting the path I offered you? If so, please state that you are unwilling to demonstrate constructive editing. --Yamla (talk) 14:26, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I am unwilling — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27bchao (talk • contribs)
 * Note this user abusively made an additional eight unblock requests. I have temporarily protected this page from further disruption, but the reviewing admin should take this into account and probably revoke talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 14:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. PhilKnight (talk) 15:04, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

FWIW, is closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 20:47, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

noting
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC)