User talk:2800:E2:2780:CC5:9D01:DA7B:BB51:836B

January 2024
Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you recently removed content from Zelda II: The Adventure of Link without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Deleting content which is sourced requires more explanation than merely an assertion that it's incorrect. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:17, 4 January 2024 (UTC)


 * nowhere on the source it says that the game Breath of the Wild is meant to be a sequel to Zelda II. AT the very least it needs to be clarified that it is currently undecided 2800:E2:2780:CC5:9D01:DA7B:BB51:836B (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The sentence you deleted didn't say that BotW was meant to be a sequel to Zelda II. It said BotW and Tears of the Kingdom "serve as the latest chapters to the Zelda continuity". AntiDionysius (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It said that the game was previously the only sequel and that that state of affairs has changed, meaning that Breath of the Wild is now its sequel or another sequel to the original Zelda. The full context has to be taken into account.
 * The sentence you quote is also another way of saying it is a sequel. 2800:E2:2780:CC5:9D01:DA7B:BB51:836B (talk) 22:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)