User talk:2804:D51:D8A:900:DC2F:D9DE:CD7B:2272

October 2019
Hello, I'm Fyunck(click). I noticed that you recently removed content from Arthur Ashe without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Why are you removing content with no edit summary? Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Is there a reason why you are removing pre-Open Era data from Arthur Ashe? Plus the Open Era began in April 1968 so why are you also removing August tournaments? Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I see you just removed a whole heap more items and said the page is incomplete. Well, the page is incomplete, I agree. It needs things added and tweaked. However removing events is not the answer. Changing court types with no sourcing is not the answer either. This should be handled in your sandbox space and then added to the article to make it better. Summaries are also REQUIRED, unless it's a tiny little edit or a continuation of a summarized edit. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:03, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Edit Warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Amazing Matt (talk) 05:10, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently removing content without explanation. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mz7 (talk) 05:56, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.