User talk:2806:105E:1F:2D31:296B:C5D:849:7975

April 2023
Hello, I'm SkyWarrior. I noticed that you recently removed content from Acapulco without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SkyWarrior 21:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Acapulco is great now, there is no need for damages. 2806:105E:1F:2D31:296B:C5D:849:7975 (talk) 22:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Acapulco. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Skynxnex (talk) 21:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Acapulco has always been beautiful and is great now, there is no need for damages 2806:105E:1F:2D31:296B:C5D:849:7975 (talk) 22:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Acapulco, you may be blocked from editing. ( Roundish  ⋆  t ) 22:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The content of the article generates invaluable damages. 2806:105E:1F:2D31:296B:C5D:849:7975 (talk) 22:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Acapulco. 2NumForIce (speak  &#124; edits) 22:12, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * the content has to be removed 2806:105E:1F:2D31:296B:C5D:849:7975 (talk) 22:18, 25 April 2023 (UTC)