User talk:2806:107E:F:5762:EDED:BBC:A1E9:C10D

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morales Surname (December 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morales Surname and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Morales_Surname Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Star_Mississippi&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Morales_Surname reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star  Mississippi  00:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The complete background data comes from Bard Google AI, so it’s commented, and the rest has reliable sources such as Británica Encyclopedia, please help to edit, as I have never claimed to be my entire work, just some of my comments of such sources, in any case the proposition is Encyclopedia matter, what is the search for the historic truth, Bio Engineering technology provides an absolute path to discover it, not based on old opinionated sources, but from a scientific point of view, the proposition is based on relevant biometrics science and its scientific assumptions, so the question is definitely important, as the genetic material from the crown of Moctezuma, currently displayed in Vienna, can debacle most of your Wikipedia historic assumptions, is is article worth to be published? Absolutely, people should have the right to question history with science, it’s very easy your dismissal, should think about it, as it opens a door to discover multiple new facts 2806:107E:F:5762:EDED:BBC:A1E9:C10D (talk) 03:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:LLM for the issues with using AI to write articles. What that generated was not coherent and will never be an article. Star   Mississippi  03:03, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I do not understand, are you asking for independent verification or just saying that you don’t like the topic? 2806:107E:F:5762:EDED:BBC:A1E9:C10D (talk) 03:18, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I am saying there was no coherent topic in either version. It was not an encyclopedic article. You're welcome to try again, but if you resubmit that text again you're going to lose access to do so. Star   Mississippi  03:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)