User talk:2A00:1851:8004:A55:FCF7:5239:864C:9BC5

Draft:South al-Mutlaa
I've moved the article into draft. Don't move it back into mainspace or it will go back to a redirect. If you move it out of draft, I will ask for page protection and start issuing warnings against you. It is a G11 promo article, a brochure article and has no right to be on Wikipedia. Work on it in draft.  scope_creep Talk  21:22, 13 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Your draftspace move is contested. You are violating Wikipedia policy because this is not the right way to delete articles. The article was previously moved to the draftspace but the movie was contested and reversed. Look at the article's history. Please follow Wikipedia policies and rules. User: Scope creep (User talk:Scope creep) you are not a Wikipedia administrator and you have been previously blocked from Wikipedia for violating Wikipedia policies. Your current actions are in violation of several Wikipedia policies. I will report your actions in the Wikipedia administrators noticeboard. Unfortunately, you will probably get blocked from editing Wikipedia (again) because it is clear that you are ignoring Wikipedia rules. The article was not promotional in any way, not a brochure article, and had every right to be in Wikipedia. In September 2021, the draftspace move was contested by me; consequently the user:JalenFolf moved the article back to the mainspace.

October 2021
Hello 2A00:1851:8004:A55:FCF7:5239:864C:9BC5. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to South al-Mutlaa, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:2A00:1851:8004:A55:FCF7:5239:864C:9BC5. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.  scope_creep Talk  21:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest Board
Hi, I added you to a note at the Conflict of Interest board at.  scope_creep Talk  13:23, 14 October 2021 (UTC)