User talk:2A00:23C4:4C36:B400:8D14:4144:4EE1:8537

RE: 2A00:23C4:4C36:B400:8D14:4144:4EE1:8537 and your disingenuous reverts.
Hello, I'm 4321edit1234. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tom Scholes-Fogg have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. 4321edit1234 02:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Scholes-Fogg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4321edit1234 02:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4321edit1234 (talk • contribs)

Re-inserting proposed deletion tags
Hi there. I see that you're continually adding a proposed deletion tag to an article after another editor has removed it. Wikipedia has a number of different methods for proposing the deletion of an article. The "PROD" process (PROposed Deletion) is meant to be used on articles that are unambiguously in need of deletion. It is an easy and expeditious method, but it only works if there is no opposition to your proposition to delete the article. When using the PROD process, if any other editor objects and removes the PROD template from the article, then the article will not be deleted, and that template should not be put back on the page. Instead, you should use the WP:AFD process. That process is a bit more cumbersome, but it can't be stopped by opposition from a single editor. Instead, it will kick off a week-long discussion between several editors about the article, and then a decision will be made regarding whether or not it should be deleted.

Hopefully that clears things up a bit for you. Please don't add the PROD template back to the article again. If you still believe that the article should be deleted, read the instructions at WP:AFD and nominate it for deletion. Thanks. ‑Scottywong | express || 03:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)


 * On second thought, I took a quick look at the article and I agree that it probably should be deleted. Therefore, I took it upon myself to nominate it for deletion at WP:AFD. The discussion can be found at Articles for deletion/Tom Scholes-Fogg. ‑Scottywong | confess || 03:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)