User talk:2A00:23C4:E084:6100:F936:85E0:CA88:9A42

August 2018
Hello, I'm PolicyReformer. I noticed that you recently removed content from OK (gesture) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Per your edit summary, it appears you disagree with the verifiable sourced content. If you have other sources which indicate the provided sources are unreliable, this is probably best addressed on the articles talk page.'' --Policy Reformer(c) 23:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at OK (gesture) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Per your edit summary, it appears you have a different view than what the sourced content provides. I take no position on your views or the editors views who added the content you're trying to remove. However, the content you are removing is supported by verifiable reliable sources. Per BRD, I think this could be best resolved on the relevant talk page. Perhaps you could list sources there to support your position and we can work to consolidate your sources with the existing content. Thanks for your time, and I hope we can work to improve Wikipedia.'' --Policy Reformer(c) 02:28, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.