User talk:2A00:23C4:F1D:4201:C100:1146:80EC:65CB

March 2021
Hello, I'm Envysan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Envysan (talk) 18:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Envysan (talk) 18:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Envysan (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Envysan (talk) 18:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently refusing to adhere to a neutral point of view; edit warring. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

{{unblock|reason= The Scottish language is being decimated by the daily continued existence of SCO Wikipedia. This is only controversial within Wikipedia's hierarchy. Simply correcting the article to state the correct facts (as is Wikipedia's goal, is not a reason to block someone. If anyone should be blocked from editing the article, it should be everyone who is claiming without citation that the Scots Wikipedia is in the Scots language at all. Portraying a mockery of a language as the genuine thing while simultaneously being the largest corpus of the language's supposed text in existence pollutes machine learning pools and has even made its way back into the Scottish education system. It IS a cultural genocide, and it is NOT written in any known language. At the very least, citation should be given from a reliable source that the SCO Wiki is in fact in Scots, for it is not.}