User talk:2A00:23C4:F81E:D201:F56B:B5AE:3DE4:8BF8

Billie-Jo Jenkins
Stop removing sourced content on the Billie-Jo article and adding content which is unsourced. The Good Dante (talk) 22:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * You should know that I am requesting an experienced editor acts against your vandalism. Stop or be blocked. The Good Dante (talk) 22:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Dante
Dante your information is incorrect though 2A00:23C4:F81E:D201:F56B:B5AE:3DE4:8BF8 (talk) 23:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * No it is not. 1) The information on the article is sourced and you need to go and read it for yourself, 2) your commentary you are trying to add is unsourced The Good Dante (talk) 23:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Ok
OK yes you're correct I'm new I have no idea but isn't that how people learn. I've already learnt a few basics. Now I know I will state sources in the future. I'm just going by what I have read and nowhere I have read states they have searched for bone fragments. This is a new examination. In 2006 he was acquitted. Maybe you are getting confused. I'm not having a go or being patronising but just go and refresh yourself on the case as this hasn't been done before. Thanks 2A00:23C4:F81E:D201:F56B:B5AE:3DE4:8BF8 (talk) 23:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * You are literally a fucking moron. All you need to do is look at the sources from his trial in 2006 to see that they looked at this evidence back then. Since you are clearly incapable of being able to click on a hyperlink, I will literally paste them here and you can go and READ THEM for yourself:
 * *http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/4723012.stm
 * *https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/billiejo-in-an-extraordinary-attack-on-her-exhusband-lois-jenkins-says-he-was-violent-and-a-liar-466364.html
 * *https://www.thefreelibrary.com/THIS+ISN%27T+OVER+YET!+After+3+murder+trials+and+9+years%2C+Jenkins+walks...-a0141897363
 * *https://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/716138.re-examine-evidence-in-billie-jos-murder/
 * Here's what you need to do. 1) read these sources and consider whether this forensic examination for bone fragments "hasn't been done before". 2) accept that Wikipedia works by referencing reliable sources and not by just writing comments based on one article you've read today with no background knowledge of the case whatsoever 3) stop vandalising Wikipedia without any understanding of the rules that govern editing. The Good Dante (talk) 23:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)