User talk:2A00:23C5:380:9C01:94DA:75C4:DF1E:2F17

Hi - You have now added extensive material to NCC Group four times in a 24-hour period despite two other editors taking the view that the amount of material is WP:UNDUE. You are edit warring and you urgently need to read WP:3RR before making further edits. Dormskirk (talk) 13:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

————

Firstly thanks for you comments, I firstly dispute these are reverts, for example you claimed the article needed citations these were added so how does that count as a revert? Second per WP:DISPUTE “the best practice is to improve it if you can rather than deleting salvageable text” you are constantly cutting text out. The last editor before me added a WP:UNDUE notification but didn’t cut the text to the extent you did, per WP:UNDUE you’re meant to discuss not just cut because you are a highly rated editor, you are removing important context. (Only 1 editor other than yourself has made edits).

Other FTSE100 organisations have controversies sections, that are of similar length in proportion to their articles. The edits are in good faith - there has been significant talk about this issue in the infosec community and it has far reaching impacts.

All quotes are cited.

While I appreciate you may not be familiar with the situation, that doesn’t mean this is a minority view or WP:UNDUE. Finally because the rest of the article is small does that mean this becomes irrelevant? Why don’t you bring the rest of the article up to length? As per WP:UNDUE consider making the post balanced if you feel it is not.

Kind Regards


 * Hi - Firstly thanks for engaging. The issue is that Wikipedia operates by consensus and there is currently a consensus of WP:UNDUE. The solution is in trimming it from the current position (or increasing the rest of the material but that's not my problem) so it is more balanced. I suggest you try trimming it some more and open up a conversation on the article talk page to secure views from User:GreenC as well. Best wishes, Dormskirk (talk) 13:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

——

Ok no problem :)! Will do - I do agree on the need to strike a balance! Am I allowed to trim more due to 3RR or should I wait a bit to see if any other editors want to comment etc? Thank you and Kind Regards


 * You will be fine as long as you trim (the problem would be when you add more material back in). I strongly urge you to engage with User:GreenC as the objective is to secure a solution that everyone is content with. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 13:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)