User talk:2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27

September 2023
Hello, I'm The Herald. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Alex Gino have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:31, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Carol Vorderman, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)


 * It's true. You have accepted edits I have made that are left wing. 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 23:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't personally review all the edits on Wikipedia. I just saw this one, and it wasn't sourced. Edits need to be sourced. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You have accepted edits without source if they are left wing. I have made them. 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 23:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The only other edit from this IP was blatant vandalism, which was reverted. —C.Fred (talk) 23:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * How is fact vandalism? 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 23:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * "Welcome to 2023!" is not a fact, it's a non-sequitur. Inserting it randomly into an article is vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * As I said, I'm really not aware what you're talking about. If you are concerned about anything that's not sourced, anywhere, please feel free to point it out to me and I'll be glad take a look. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If you're not aware, don't comment. It makes you appear stupid. 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:30EF:A2F2:D363:F6CA (talk) 01:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Carol Vorderman, you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Carol Vorderman. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I have edited wiki on many occasions without source. What is it about this fact that you object to? 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 23:49, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't know how to make this any clearer: when I see unsourced content, I remove it. If you have concerns about unsourced content elsewhere, please feel free to point them out and I'll go find them and, if they are indeed unsourced, remove them. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I made them, they weren't removed. I guess you thought they agreed with your left wing agenda. They were actually sarcasm, but I guess you didn't realise. 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 23:54, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1. If I had a left wing agenda, why would I be on the side of the Liberal Democrats, a centrist party? Hell, why would I even care about UK politics, I'm neither from there or live there
 * 2. Do you think claiming to have broken Wikipedia's policies in the long term is going to help here? AntiDionysius (talk) 23:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If it's obvious you're not from here if you think the Lib Dems are centrist. 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 👍 AntiDionysius (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Learnt anything about British politics since your uninformed response? 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:30EF:A2F2:D363:F6CA (talk) 01:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yep. Time to stop. Drmies (talk) 23:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You don't approve facts? 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 23:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * What is it about this fact that you object to? That it violates the biographies of living persons policy by not being supported by a reliable source sufficient to verify it. —C.Fred (talk) 23:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Check it out yourself, it's a fact. Not my problem if you can't be bothered. 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 23:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * It is the responsibility of the person who adds material to source it. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I haven't before. Poor excause. 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sure you think you're making some killer political point here but at the end of the day, you can either comply with Wikipedia's policies, or your edits will be removed. If you keep putting them back, you'll end up banned, and Wikipedia will continue being an incredibly popular informational resource (not least because of its firm commitment to transparent sourcing), and no one is going to read this talk page. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia ban any view that isn't far left. Sad. 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 00:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, this is getting stupid. Drmies (talk) 00:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I would not necessarily equate "far left" with following the rules, but looking at American politics, I can see how one could make the leap of logic that anybody who actually abides by the rules is on the far left. 😁 —C.Fred (talk) 00:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not an American, but you're obviously a leftist. Emoji's are only used by childish people of low IQ. 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:30EF:A2F2:D363:F6CA (talk) 01:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Incredibly popular? What sad leftist bubble do you live in? 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:30EF:A2F2:D363:F6CA (talk) 01:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Done…and actually, the claim does not check out. The article almost makes the opposite point. —C.Fred (talk) 23:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Lies. 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 00:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * As the expression goes, put up or shut up. Either give a link to a specific source, or this line of discussion is over. —C.Fred (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Ooh! 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:3D06:4C3D:940:E27 (talk) 00:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Care to apologise now she has publicly stated her support? 2A00:23C5:E92D:3701:30EF:A2F2:D363:F6CA (talk) 01:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)