User talk:2A00:23C7:2B37:A701:5EB:696C:68B6:5858

October 2023
Hello, I'm --WikiUser1234945--. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ineos—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 10:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jim Ratcliffe. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:19, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jim Ratcliffe was changed by 2A00:23C7:2B37:A701:5EB:696C:68B6:5858 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867817 on 2023-10-15T10:19:05+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jim Ratcliffe, you may be blocked from editing. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 10:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jim Ratcliffe. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 10:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)