User talk:2A00:23C7:6120:F101:E430:3884:C43D:28BC

Nov 22
And I suggest you take a less combative tone, especially when this edit [] was clealy wp:vandalism as it changes North Korea to Best Korea. So read WP:NOTDUMB. Not as well that dishonest edit summaries are frowned upon. Slatersteven (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Right, didn't realise that one stuck. Joke edit - never meant to save it. Still, he wiped the whole edit - not OK. So there. 2A00:23C7:6120:F101:E430:3884:C43D:28BC (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * And read wp:not, and yes it was OK to revert the whole thing. We aren't required to read all of your edits if some of them are "jokes". If you want to be taken seriously act like it. So far you have made (apart from this talk page) 4 edits, two are very minor changes to the color of an entry on a table, and one was pure vandalism, which is not a good look. Slatersteven (talk) 14:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)