User talk:2A00:23C7:69C9:5101:ED0D:8D34:F7E6:553F

October 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Education in England, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 03:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Education in England. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey, can you give me examples of how my edit was my own point of view? I'm lost 2A00:23C7:69C9:5101:ED0D:8D34:F7E6:553F (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The tone of the text you added seemed to overly praise the subject matter, thus not adhering to a neutral point of view. Statements like "It introduces pupils to the best that has been thought and said, and helps engender an appreciation of human creativity and achievements," are not appropriate for an encyclopedia (see also MOS:PUFFERY). On a second look, it appears that the text was directly copy-pasted for the cited source. This is generally not allowed for copyright reasons, though it appears that the website you cited uses an open license. Nonetheless, it is better to paraphrase sources rather than directly copy them. Directly quoted text should be indicated as such. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I did not write that bit, I was trying to put together two sections that could be merged together under one Curriculum section. The text was already there. 2A00:23C7:69C9:5101:ED0D:8D34:F7E6:553F (talk) 03:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Adding context to changes
Greetings - I noted the changes you made to the English Edu., section 16+.

Could I politely ask that you expand on the edits when you post them - I think registering would help - I am aware of the dynamic addressing diatribe - but it helps communicate with you.

I thought there was value in your 16 plus edits - but they do totally repeat the opening discussion on what compulsory means in England - you also did cite other paths - but do you think this might be better higher in the article?

Cheers -

BeingObjective (talk) 18:33, 20 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey there, I like the changes you made to the post-16 section. Much better now. 2A00:23C7:69C9:5101:ED0D:8D34:F7E6:553F (talk) 21:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)