User talk:2A00:23C7:7998:3901:1C82:8F68:66A3:A742

October 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Borrowers (1997 film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 00:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm not entirely sure I understand your problem; I didn't put anything subjective onto the page (e.g. subjective personal views on the film's quality, or the talent of its director), it was a simple observation that I suspect would not be contested by anyone familiar with the subject at hand. Despite bearing the title of the book, and carrying over the bare bones of its story, the film is so drastically different in tone and content from any of Mary Norton's novels that I feel it is worth acknowledging this, especially in the opening paragraph. As for your boilerplate statement concerning sources, does one really need to back up a simple, banal observation that a screen adaptation of a novel is almost entirely different from said novel? 2A00:23C7:7998:3901:1C82:8F68:66A3:A742 (talk) 00:28, 27 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Regarding There was no citation for that. It appears to be your own analysis or synthesis of content. If you would like someone else's opinion, I would suggest you ask at the wp:Teahouse. You can copy the source for your edit from the editor:  Cheers Adakiko (talk) 00:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * There was no citation, because it doesn't need one! Any mortal can simply glance at the synopsis for the film and then compare it to the synopsis of the original novel to discover that it's a completely different story in a completely different setting with different characters! As for your comments re: "synthesis of content" - isn't writing an article about something that exists by definition a "synthesis of content"? 2A00:23C7:7998:3901:1C82:8F68:66A3:A742 (talk) 01:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)