User talk:2A00:23C7:85A1:A801:E99B:432F:7773:122E

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Randykitty (talk) 22:49, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

guptaleft
Times Higher Edudcation and also the Society of Legal Scholars reporter has hammered this journal for failing to comply with international standards of collective editing, having open contests for editor roles, only having white male editors since its establishment in 1885 and only one editor so no process for dealing with conflicts of interests, and most importantly for failing to use double blind review and implying that the senior members of the judicary who are on the advisory board only are somehow involved in editing the journal and thus that that is a substitute for only having one elderly white male editor in his 70s deciding who gets in the journal. 