User talk:2A00:23C8:9DAE:1B01:4185:2D46:DB84:5332

February 2024
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Junglies. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peter Sallis. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)


 * All I did was add something to Peter Sallis Wikipedia page that was connected to a source on en.kinorium.com that shows him on and you just removed it for no reason. The thing I added was connected to a source and you just removed it for no reason pi** off 2A00:23C8:9DAE:1B01:4185:2D46:DB84:5332 (talk) 07:41, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * You are an idiot when all I did was add a source to his Wikipedia so why don’t you leave me alone when I did nothing wrong 109.146.88.140 (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh and by the way I’ve used that source many times in the past ever since November of 2023 and I never got blocked before so can you tell me why now I’m not allowed to use that source anymore when on Wikipedia it says it’s a reliable source 2A00:23C8:9DAE:1B01:4185:2D46:DB84:5332 (talk) 08:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * When has Kinorium been described as a reliable source? It seems to be another information aggregating site like IMDb, which wouldn't fall under this site's standards for a good source. Harryhenry1 (talk) 08:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * A user know as Waxworker said that kinorium is a reliable 2A00:23C8:9DAE:1B01:4185:2D46:DB84:5332 (talk) 20:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * For future reference, all they've said about Kinorium is that it's "of unclear reliability", which isn't the same as saying it's reliable. Harryhenry1 (talk) 02:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 19:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)


 * f**k off I haven’t done anything wrong 2A00:23C8:9DAE:1B01:4185:2D46:DB84:5332 (talk) 20:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @HJ Mitchell you may want to revoke TPA. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * What does TPA mean 2A00:23C8:9DAE:1B01:4185:2D46:DB84:5332 (talk) 20:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I know how to add this on pages for a year and now it gone forever 2A00:23C8:9DAE:1B01:4185:2D46:DB84:5332 (talk) 20:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Why an I not allowed to use kinorium when I’ve been using it for the best year give me a reason why all of a suddenly now it not a reliable source 2A00:23C8:9DAE:1B01:4185:2D46:DB84:5332 (talk) 20:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * When your block expires, post here to get opinions on whether that site is a reliable source. However, if you only come back to continue spamming that site without getting an opinion, all your edits will keep being reverted on the spot. The burden is on you to prove its reliability. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.