User talk:2A00:23EE:19B0:4F9:858D:7489:7E57:35C7

March 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Bruno Fernandes, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bruno Fernandes. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 00:57, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bruno Fernandes, you may be blocked from editing. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 01:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi 2A00:23EE:19B0:4F9:858D:7489:7E57:35C7! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Bruno Fernandes several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 01:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)