User talk:2A00:A040:195:5461:A13A:3F56:E50D:8C7D

March 2021
Your recent editing history at Josué Pesqueira shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GiantSnowman 12:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Josué Pesqueira.  GiantSnowman 12:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Do you notice what you're doing? The long-edited edit was systematically restored all the time. The edit you are restoring has been around for a long time and no one has corrupted it except one person and you are allowing him to continue to corrupt the value in you that you are restoring the old and outdated version for a long time. If any editor has a desire to recreate a discussion on a talk page and does not sleep and then asks to discuss it, it is the opposite of the procedures 2A00:A040:195:5461:A13A:3F56:E50D:8C7D - talk 14:18, 01 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi GiantSnowman, Returns the last edit that was a long time ago. Why return the old and not the latest version? What is the reason? There is no logic at all. The new version was a long time until someone came and changed it and you leave it like that? Bring it back 2A00:A040:195:5461:A13A:3F56:E50D:8C7D - talk 14:34, 01 March 2021 (UTC)