User talk:2A01:36D:1200:6B6:61BC:45D9:2CEA:8AD5

June 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Flush toilet have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Flush toilet was changed by 2A01:36D:1200:6B6:61BC:45D9:2CEA:8AD5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972218 on 2021-06-30T08:28:23+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sebastian Vettel. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sebastian Vettel was changed by 2A01:36D:1200:6B6:61BC:45D9:2CEA:8AD5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960462 on 2021-06-30T08:30:08+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:18, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Israel, West Virginia.   David Biddulph (talk) 09:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Your recent editing history at Aaron Swartz shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drill it (talk) 08:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Noh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Ján Volko) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  09:36, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Given this I think 24 hours might be too short. If this were a registered account that would be grounds for an indefinite block, so whatever the IP equivalent is should probably be considered. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 09:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see you're aware of it. For some reason, I wasn't notified that you undid my removal. Yeah, I'll leave it at that then. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 09:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 09:45, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Given the violent nature of their report I have made this a 1 week block, TPA removed, with a /64 range. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 09:46, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

If you want to have this block reviewed see WP:UTRS. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 11:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)