User talk:2A01:4A0:4A:52:0:0:0:E2DA

July 2018
Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:36, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Spygate (conspiracy theory). Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Home Lander (talk) 16:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for trolling and harassment. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 17:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

What??
What?? 

Democrat is a noun. Democratic is an ad·jec·tive. It's either "Democratic Congressman Adam Schiff" or "Democrat Adam Schiff." How do you not know this? 2A01:4A0:4A:52:0:0:0:E2DA (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The sentence is awkwardly worded, but you ignore clauses in parenthesis when grammatically reading things - thus, Democratic and Republican Congressmen have dismissed Trump's May 2018 allegations as lacking evidence, and maintained that the FBI did not do anything improper is the proper construction. Better would be just to rewrite the whole sentence, of course. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 20:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2018
Your recent editing history at Patriot Prayer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 23:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 01:54, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

November 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Gab (social network). Tsumikiria (T/C) 05:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
w umbolo  ^^^  19:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Marek Jan Chodakiewicz shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 19:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for continued edit warring across multiple articles despite previous blocks for disruptive behaviour. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:04, 27 November 2018 (UTC)


 * You'll likely only be unblocked if you agree to two things for 3 months: (1) not following other editors around, and (2) not reverting more than 0 or 1 times in 24 hours. w umbolo   ^^^  22:16, 27 November 2018 (UTC)