User talk:2A01:4B00:865F:C600:8940:8CC3:8B11:F477

 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Your spam campaign is over. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:53, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by inappropriate links? It's the new version of memidex.com and I'm simply replacing the old links! If you don't believe my word on WordNet connection: https://wordnet.princeton.edu/related-projects 2A01:4B00:865F:C600:8940:8CC3:8B11:F477 (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * memidex.com is literally broken, so I'm simply improving Wikipedia. Let me know if you can find a better Wordnet visualiser so that I can use it. 2A01:4B00:865F:C600:8940:8CC3:8B11:F477 (talk) 18:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Courtesy ping, the IP replied to you – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 18:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * What does this mean? 2A01:4B00:865F:C600:8940:8CC3:8B11:F477 (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Neither the old nor the new link meets WP:RS guidelines, and was excessively canvassed by the same IP range, hence the blacklisting. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe the IP was asking what Courtesy ping, the IP replied to you meant. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I was simply fixing a broken link. I just added it to the Wordnet page and after realising the broken 'memidex' link, I thought I can replace the broken ones.
 * I don't know why fixing a broken link seems to be act of vandalism and results in blacklisting of the entire url. Isn't that too harsh?
 * Also, again, I really thought I was just simply fixing the broken link, and putting a VERIFIED WORDNET VISUALISER, THAT IS VERIFIED BY PRINCETON UNIVERISTY.
 * Again, please check lengusa:
 * https://wordnet.princeton.edu/related-projects 2A01:4B00:865F:C600:8940:8CC3:8B11:F477 (talk) 19:07, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Once again, the links are not useful and do not meet WP:RS, period. It's irrelevant what academic project your own project is forked from. "Verified by Princeton" doesn't mean you can spam it all over Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Is there a way to escalate this? I think blacklisting a url for fixing broken links (and there is just 7 of them) might be an overkill, unless it's how it's done in Wikipedia. 2A01:4B00:865F:C600:8940:8CC3:8B11:F477 (talk) 19:13, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You can see the blacklisting entry here; that page also has a "proposed removal" section. Before doing that, you'll want to review WP:COI and make the appropriate declarations. It's also worth noting that you were not simply replacing citations, but adding inline spamverts and adding unnecessary and inappropriate refs. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * "Please indicate why you expect that that abuse has stopped."
 * The thing makes it 'spammy' is adding it to ~7 places, and I did that to replace the dead 'memidex' url. Both are WordNet visualisers, it's not like I replaced dead 'memidex' url with something completely different.
 * The abuse (which I wasn't thinking it's an abuse) has stopped. 2A01:4B00:865F:C600:8940:8CC3:8B11:F477 (talk) 13:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You can state your case (along with your COI declarations) at the blacklisting page in the "proposed removals" section. Good luck. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It's really strange one person like you has all of this power and can speak in such a condescending manner. 2A01:4B00:865F:C600:8940:8CC3:8B11:F477 (talk) 18:14, 3 November 2022 (UTC)