User talk:2A01:4C8:1400:C6BF:E568:6240:28C8:82E3

On your recent edits
I just wanted to take the opportunity to mention that if you wish your viewpoint on AI to be heard, it may be more constructive to make sourced edits presenting a neutral point-of-view -- rather than edits containing unsourced, opinionated statements, which will be reverted. For example, you might consider finding reliable sources referencing one or more notable figures who share your point of view, and editing the Criticism section of GPT-4 to include this information. Thank you. sam1370 (talk · contribs) 22:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to GPT-4, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walt Yoder (talk) 20:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to GPT-4. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)