User talk:2A01:4C8:41:2AA:31B3:DF81:A536:3285

Hi there, can you explain your reasoning with the edit you made at Avinash Sachdev. Per MOS:LISTSOFWORKS it becomes appropriate when works differ in one table. Fiction shows and non-fiction are different, so we should separate them. There shouldn't be any confusion here. RYLELT7 (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Re there is no confusion and no it’s not fiction and non fiction shows should not have different tables. They both come under television and should only be in one table. Please look at other tv actors pages for example Sidharth Shukla (it does not mean I gave you and example you will start changing stuff in Sidharth's television section. Please understand and stop arguing with me and leave the way it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:544F:7942:DC47:C57D (talk) 18:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm going to inform you once again. Stop saying I am arguing otherwise I will report you for personal attacks (WP:NPA). I am talking on your talk page and that is not arguing so I'll suggest refrain from saying that I am arguing. By continuously saying that, you are discouraging me from editing Wikipedia which Wikipedia has zero tolerance towards that. I asked you to explain your edits and I do not see anything wrong with that. They are an encyclopedia (anyone can edit) and that by attacking editors who have done nothing wrong, that destroys their goal. Got it? I do not see any consensus on this and neither do I see a written down guideline that I looked at so far. Anon, I am not reverting your edits so on the view history page just because something has changed that not mean that you have been reverted. Another note that Wikipedia says is to not take offence if you are reverted. The way you explain in your edit summary, it looks like you are furious. In which again, Wikipedia does not want editors to discuss that in the summary. It called edit summary to explain edits, not to target others.
 * Do you think fiction and non-fiction should be split under filmography? Their different mediums and different than an actors television work. This MOS:WORKS had given an example to this in which work is split up and many more actors work is also split up to reduce merging and confusion. RYLELT7 (talk) 18:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

I have explained my edits. Did you see Sidharths television section and for filmography we only use that word if he had been a part of anything else but he hasn’t just television. Looks like you haven’t understood what I am saying. And sorry for saying you are arguing because the way you are saying it can trigger someone else to think you are. And plus you did revert my edit see here  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:544F:7942:DC47:C57D (talk) 19:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

RYLELT7 did you see Sidharth Shukla's page as an example I don’t think you have. Please do and you will see that reality shows are with the shows have acted in same goes in Shrenu Parikh and Kishwer Merchant — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:544F:7942:DC47:C57D (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I think you should create an account because you do edit Wikipedia quite often. This way, it will be easier for editors to communicate with you because editing while logged becomes difficult to reach out since IP addresses change. As far as this discussion is concerned, I don't think there is a big problem to leave fiction with non-fiction. However, I might change it once I get a more clear target for this discussion. I can't seem to find a topic relating to this so at the same time, you are also not 100% right. I'll leave it for now, but it might change in the future.
 * See! Look how easy we reached a solution to discussion while being civil! It's not that hard. RYLELT7 (talk) 19:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh and additional note: Fiction and non-fiction for this article has been separated for a very long time and with over 1000 edits on this page, and no one seemed to have an issue with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RYLELT7 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

RYLELT7 No just please leave it as it is I asked you a question did you see the examples I have told you to see ie Sidharth. Please don’t leave it as I am right about this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:544F:7942:DC47:C57D (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I will leave it for now until there is an agreed upon decision from the community. It is not set in stone. Farewell. RYLELT7 (talk) 19:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

RYLELT7 Stop reverting my edits for no reason you don’t own articles like Avinash Sachdev you can’t leave links that are spelt wrong. You seem to be reverting everything people so don’t try lying because I have seen it and it’s on your history as well if you keep doing it you know it’s called a 3 way warning that if you keep reverting for more than 10 times you will be reported. This is not what I’m saying I have seen this happen to lots of users. Please listen and please answer my question the fiction and non fiction both come under one table please stop dragging this on and don’t change it. Ok thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:28A9:9BF5:46EC:1063 (talk) 20:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)  this is not a personal attack but it what you are doing I hate those who lie so please just leave the tables as it is in Avinash Sachdev I have even explained in more than ten times and you still don’t seem to understand again I am giving you an example look in Sidharth Shukla to see that reality shows (non fiction) are in the same with fiction look with Balika Vadhu and Bigg boss in the same.
 * And what did I do? Tell me? I agreed to leave it. So I honestly do not why you are going out of you way to settle this. I do not at all appreciate your disrespect here, anon. Familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's core policies. Major one right here, WP:CIVIL. You need to understand that you need to deal with issues while being calm and with respect. I had given you several warnings not to approach me with incivility, but you continue to do so. I usually never report users but you are one of them that have no sign to be respectful. You are fundamentally violating Wikipedia's goal in which you awknownelage edits and treat people with respect, even during disputes. You are destroying their goal. You have called me liar for reverting your edit? Totally unacceptable. RYLELT7 (talk) 20:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

There is no need py report me as I have not done any personal attacks just this was a discussion. Which I think the one table is needed. And plus you said earlier you did not revert any of my edits when you did so I was not wrong about you lying RYLELT7 and ok I understand that you have agreed I did not know you agreed to it please don’t do anything to the table and leave it and I am totally sorry for this. Please accept my apology. You need to also not revert all edits when people are editing in Avinash Sachdev page if there is a possible vandalism than yes not when someone is trying to correct a mispellt or redirect page like you did here  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:2CEE:2B5C:F403:23A0 (talk) 20:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

And I said sorry about asking people to ban you and the fan comment please just move on from it. I am sorry again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:2CEE:2B5C:F403:23A0 (talk) 20:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)


 * You should have refrained from doing so in your previous warnings. Incivility consists of personal attacks, rudeness and disrespectful comments. Especially when done in an aggressive manner, these often alienate editors and disrupt the project through unproductive stressors and conflict from WP:UNCIVIL. Calling me a liar, wanting me ban for no reason, saying that I am a owner of a page, saying that I am arguing fro opening discussions and seeking consensus all perfectly fall under this policy in which you have violated. You cannot dodge and mask you action here, anon. FarewellRYLELT7 (talk) 20:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

RYLELT7 Ok I take back my words please move on all I want to advice you is don’t revert every edit some user has done on Avinash only do it when it is a possible vandalism like I wanted to only add the right links in Chotti Bahu and Iss Pyaar Ko and you rv it for no reason. That’s all I want to say and I am sorry for saying all of that. Please end this and move on from it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:2CEE:2B5C:F403:23A0 (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok be cautious next time, you need to remove your comments on the bot page first. I also suggest that you should create an account. RYLELT7 (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

RYLELT7 did you understand about the last comment I said as an advice — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:1974:7A35:CE9C:A552 (talk) 21:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you understand that reverting edits are not only for vandalism? RYLELT7 (talk) 21:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)