User talk:2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:8453:DBFF:FE05:6E2F

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that triggered the edit filter. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 15:35, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * Odd, I'd swear that I saw what I put in my comment above in the block log, but now it says "vandalism". Must have been confused. 331dot (talk) 21:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

You asked about a vandalism block. It wasn't (if it says so, it is a mistake). What it was is a repeatedly triggering filters temporary block. If a user sees their edits do not go through. there is a time when you must ask yourself, why. Stop doing it, and investigate, or ask. You would think a user will figure after 3 or 4 tries that something is happening. He did not stop. He did 20 tries, at different times of the same day. -- Alexf(talk) 21:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm still mystified. What do you mean by "their edits do not go through"? What should I have noticed? 2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:D8D9:97FF:FE57:E2CC (talk) 22:29, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 * , that's incredibly poor explanation for such a bad block. Legitimate edits get caught by filters all the time, so you should never concentrate only on filter hits without looking at the actual context. The user clearly explained in the edit summaries why they removed certain content. The fact that you don't realize that you labeled your block as vandalism makes this even more bizarre. Widr (talk) 22:38, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok. Live and learn. I'll be more careful. -- Alexf(talk) 01:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)