User talk:2A01:4C8:A0:75C2:90FF:D37E:3140:8154

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions to W. T. Caho&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Clovermoss 🍀 (talk) 07:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
Your recent editing history at John H. Shen-Sampas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 22:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but in which edit was I edit warring? Surely restoring maintenance templates when the problem hasn't been fixed isn't edit warring?
 * Perhaps you're thinking of anon editor 2601:646:401:9B0:2CA6:A853:A963:7B0? 2A01:4C8:A0:75C2:90FF:D37E:3140:8154 (talk) 23:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tim Connor (Entrepreneur)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * , please see the edit summary, it's all unsourced. 2A01:4C8:A0:75C2:90FF:D37E:3140:8154 (talk) 09:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)