User talk:2A01:CB05:620:DC00:4539:3DA8:7A31:4A67

September 2022
Hello, I'm That Coptic Guy. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Still Loving You, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 23:44, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hi 2A01:CB05:620:DC00:4539:3DA8:7A31:4A67! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Still Loving You several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 00:58, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Still Loving You. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Rv unreferenced — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 02:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)