User talk:2A02:1810:363D:6700:F9DE:BDEF:E68C:A727

March 2022
Hello, I'm Martinevans123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Ludwig Wittgenstein have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


 * you're the one doing the vandalism here. Educate urself... 2A02:1810:363D:6700:F9DE:BDEF:E68C:A727 (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm restoring articles to the previous stable state, before your unnecessary over-linking edits. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * have you seen any other of my changes that were made while doing that? then only remove links. 2A02:1810:363D:6700:F9DE:BDEF:E68C:A727 (talk) 16:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hi 2A02:1810:363D:6700:F9DE:BDEF:E68C:A727! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of CyberPowerPC several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at Talk:CyberPowerPC, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)