User talk:2A02:27B0:4C01:FBD0:BC6C:29AA:8922:E37F

February 2023
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Shooting of Abby Zwerner. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. (talk) 12:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Shooting of Abby Zwerner, you may be blocked from editing. (talk) 15:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Shooting of Abby Zwerner. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Shooting of Abby Zwerner
What is the relevance of the child's (uncited) race? ... disco spinster   talk  15:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)