User talk:2A02:2A57:8EF3:0:E53C:78E4:2F95:90FD

Question
I mean, really, why can't you stand coherence in discourse (popular coverage of science/nanoeconomics)? Ok, I understood that the coverage was somewhat complex and not very clear/legible for average Wikipedia reader/user. OK. But why don't you or anyone in the community take it up and edit it to smooth, simplify and make it more legible? I mean why is there such retrograde, regressive, awkward, passive/reactive, half-intellectual, almost impotent approach/attitude to this? I really wonder! I will be perhaps even more surprised if you/anyone finds energy/willingness/vigor/spirit to follow up on/reply to this question. I mean, why isn't there the healthy spirit for collaboration, learning, growth, development? Questions, questions, questions ...