User talk:2A02:2F08:B30C:8600:34E2:F5B7:56C1:66

November 2019
I am writing this here because it appears to be the talk page of the latest IP address you have used. At present the length of the block is set at a week, but the block does not have to stay in place for that long. If you have read and understood what I have written, and you think you can avoid making the same mistakes in future, you may ask for an administrator to unblock your IP range. To do that, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text at the bottom of the talk page of your current IP address, replacing the words "Your reason here" with an explanation of why you think you should be unblocked. (This page is for the IP address 2A02:2F08:B30C:8600:34E2:F5B7:56C1:66; if you are now on another IP address then click the "talk" link at the very top of the page to go to your current IP address's talk page.) If any administrator who reviews an unblock request from you thinks unblocking is suitable, they are welcome to unblock you without consulting me, but it would be good if they could let me know that they have done so. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 22:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * In various ways your editing has been unconstructive, which is why I have blocked your IP range (2A02:2F08:B30C:8600:0:0:0:0/64) from editing. If you had an account I would have first posted you a warning about the problems, blocking only if the problems continued after the warning. However, if I did that now your IP address might have changed again by the time you came back, in which case you might never see the warning. I suggest you consider getting an account once the block is over. There are many advantages in having an account, including the fact that it makes it far easier for other editors to communicate with you if your IP address changes.
 * Please don't add tags to articles where they don't belong, such as "featured article" tags to articles which are not featured, page protection tags to articles which are not protected, and "good article" tags to articles which have not gone through the appropriate assessment process. If you don't know how the tags should be used then don't use them.
 * Please don't remove content, such as date format tags, without explaining your reason for doing so. You may have good reasons, but it is not evident that you have.
 * On one article you tried to add an infobox, and made a mistake in doing so, which messed things up. There is never a good reason for leaving a mistake like that in place: please always check how the article looks with your change, and don't leave it if you have made a mistake.
 * I am writing explanations of what most of the problems are and asking you to stop making the same mistakes, because I am assuming that most of the problems are innocent mistakes because you are new to editing Wikipedia, and don't fully understand how things work. If that is so, you should be able to take note of what I say and learn to do better. However, some of your edits to at least one article looked as though they might be deliberate vandalism. I hope that is not so.