User talk:2A02:2F0B:4207:CE00:9B6:381F:37CB:F853

May 2022
Hello, I'm DoebLoggs. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Evermoor Chronicles without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Evermoor Chronicles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Curse of La Llorona, you may be blocked from editing. ~  car path ian flo rist  10:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at The Evermoor Chronicles. ~  car path ian flo rist  10:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 12:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)