User talk:2A02:582:2481:2200:8519:461E:84F7:BC4

April 2019
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Getrag F28/6 transmission, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Getrag F28/6 transmission. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:38, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 03:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


 * As further information, please see What Wikipedia is not and Verifiability. Wikipedia is not a forum, blog, soapbox, fan site, message board, advice site, advertising vehicle or tabloid. It is an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not publish rumors, gossip, personal opinions, personal experiences, messages, commentary, advocacy, complaints, advice, joke edits, promotional material, original research or unsourced information likely to be changed, challenged or disputed. Text is written in complete sentences. See also Biographies of living persons, Five Pillars, Identifying reliable sources, Citing sources, Help:Footnotes, No original research, Manual of Style/Words to watch and Neutral point of view. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Referencing for beginners; Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:44, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Your addition of Opel specialists as a source is not a reliable, verifiable, neutral source. Obviously it can not be verified. It is not up to the Wikipedia reader to seek out sources. That is a requirement for the addition of information that can be challenged, including comparisons and assertions of superiority.


 * This policy is stated on several Wikipedia policy and guideline pages. For example, in "No original research. "Main page: Verifiability. Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The policy says that all material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, needs a reliable source; what counts as a reliable source is described at Verifiability." "Wikipedia editors are not indifferent to truth, but as a collaborative project, its editors are not making judgments as to what is true and what is false, but what can be verified in a reliable source and otherwise belongs in Wikipedia." Verifiability, not truth. I will revert your repeated edit again without leaving another warning. After that, if you continue to add unsourced material, you will receive a warning that you will be blocked from editing if you again add the unsourced text. Donner60 (talk) 03:52, 4 April 2019 (UTC)