User talk:2A02:8084:51BC:9A00:F81D:8737:5DA6:DE04

I assume you're the same anonymous editor who was so keen to emphasise the allegations of paedophilia against Cathal Ó Searcaigh, allegations which were investigated and for which no evidence was found. You were presumably caught up in the nationwide controversy at the time, and I appreciate that people formed strong opinions which may, on both sides, have been more emotional than evidence based. It's sometimes hard to move on from such a position, but the fact is that there was no evidence, no charges; a lot of heat and no light. I'm keen to put that episode into perspective, not unbalance the article by perpetuating apparently unfounded allegations. If its outcome had been different I would have taken a different editorial decision. Anyway, I can see the logic of your present edit and I won't argue with it. Dmhball~enwiki (talk) 23:53, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

After posting this, I noticed that another editor reverted your post. Sorry about that. I won't interfere. Dmhball~enwiki (talk) 00:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)