User talk:2A02:8109:2A3F:F4B0:8D4C:2A07:9786:6F73

October 2023
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Captain Laserhawk: A Blood Dragon Remix—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Captain Laserhawk: A Blood Dragon Remix. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Captain Laserhawk: A Blood Dragon Remix was changed by 2A02:8109:2A3F:F4B0:8D4C:2A07:9786:6F73 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978373 on 2023-10-22T22:12:44+00:00

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Captain Laserhawk: A Blood Dragon Remix. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. miranda 3 22:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)