User talk:2A02:8109:3B40:3AC8:908E:F559:2CA5:D651

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skyscraper (software) (June 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skyscraper (software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Skyscraper_(software) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Skyscraper_(software) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skyscraper (software) (June 18)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Skyscraper_(software) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Yet again resubmitted without any attempt at demonstrating notability or otherwise improving the draft. Based on that, and the multiple earlier declines, I can only conclude that better source are not available and the subject is therefore not notable enough to warrant inclusion. To avoid further reviewer effort being expended on this, I am now rejecting rather than merely declining this draft.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC)