User talk:2A02:8109:A83F:EA9F:98DA:8909:635A:851C

November 2022
Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Kerry Shale. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''' FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 08:55, 14 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Do not undone changes by others without providing a reason. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 2A02:8109:A83F:EA9F:98DA:8909:635A:851C (talk) 08:58, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Btw, people like you are the reason why articles on Wikipedia are lacking information and because you undo changes WITHOUT providing a reason and without applying the rules you are referring to. 2A02:8109:A83F:EA9F:98DA:8909:635A:851C (talk) 09:01, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I already explained on your previous IP address on my revert. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You need to properly add your source to the article. Just saying the source is not enough. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:15, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * FilmandTVFan28: Ok, I have reverted it the last time now. I'm a dear Kerry Shale fan. But you people are DISGUSTING. There are enough sources, you only need to use Google by yourself. "You need to properly add your source to the article." I had even added a direct link. What more do you want? You know what? It is YOUR article now! But please care it is filled with any information. 2A02:8109:A83F:EA9F:98DA:8909:635A:851C (talk) 09:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * In fact: You alone care for that article now. Because I won't be in the mood for that in the future anymore. I did what you asked for, but you pretend otherwise. 2A02:8109:A83F:EA9F:98DA:8909:635A:851C (talk) 09:30, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I knew it. No answer, no reason. Just unfair practices!!! At least it is visible in the article history. For everyone! Congrats on that! Anyway, can you also contribute something or only revert it? See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FilmandTVFan28 2A02:8109:A83F:EA9F:98DA:8909:635A:851C (talk) 09:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 3mi1y reverted your last edit for the same as Waxworker and myself. None of your reverts have shown that you added your source to the article. Saying your source in an edit summary doesn't work either way. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 13:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * That is, of course, a nice answer: Because Waxworker had done the same before. I will use it as an excuse in the future, too. Yeah, of course, a 3rd will join in and do the same. Since when do you use Wikipedia? Since yesterday? Again, I had provided sources with links!!! And again, at least it will be visible to everyone what had happened there. A lot of other people had tried to add the same information as me there before. "None of your reverts have shown that you added your source to the article. Saying your source in an edit summary doesn't work either way." - And why do you don't improve the article by yourself then?  - I think I may watch your future edits in the future as well and will simply revert it for no reason at all. I cannot see in other articles no number beside the birthdate either. Are you sure that Kerry Shale even exists? Are you sure that he is only an actor and writer, where is the source there? Something tells me that he is also a voice over artist, but who knows if you would accept hundreds of YouTube videos, and voices can be faked, for example by Kerry Shale himself. Things which are obvious to others. But again, your fault that the article never ever improves. 2A02:8109:A83F:EA9F:98DA:8909:635A:851C (talk) 18:13, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I have been here longer than you and I actually know how things really work. Also, we do not point fingers on whose fault it is. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 20:09, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You are on Wikipedia since 15+ years? I have been on Wikipedia since it was still unknown. LOL. Your comments are full of prejudices, you don't know me, but you know that you are longer on Wikipedia than me. I have also a Wikipedia user, but I'm too lazy to use it since Wikipedia became a kindergarten as we can see here. I cannot see that you have ever contributed something by yourself. I only see your reverting other people's work. Why not be a better example and improve the work of others? Why is that? 2A02:8109:A83F:EA9F:98DA:8909:635A:851C (talk) 06:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * (Btw, my English language skills may leave the impression that I may be younger. But please be aware that I'm not a English native speaker, I guess you haven't noticed that yet, too. I'm far better to express myself in my native language, believe me. So much about prejudices. It's rather a sign that you are quite new in the WWW in general. ;-)) 2A02:8109:A83F:EA9F:98DA:8909:635A:851C (talk) 06:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
 * P.S. If you write in some of your edit summaries yesterday that you need a vacation/break, it is surely a sign that you are not dealing with an absolute beginner. As a tip. 2A02:8109:A83F:EA9F:98DA:8909:635A:851C (talk) 06:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kerry Shale. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.