User talk:2A02:908:4F5:AAE0:40A8:33D9:1160:CF3F

March 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Guy (help!) 00:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

RE: Bias in section on "Philosophy and Ethics" in the article on "Artificial Intelligence"
I reverted the edit which added a paragraph on SCOT because it was unreferenced and therefore couldn't be verified by the reader. The revert was purely for that reason - I have no view on whether or not the article is biased, as I'm not a subject matter expert and aren't in a position to make that judgement. Neiltonks (talk) 12:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)