User talk:2A02:A45D:25BD:1:D8A1:DBCC:9484:4A2C

November 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cyclura nubila, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.   Fragrant Peony (talk) 15:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Cyclura nubila
Please could you keep your edit summaries civil, thanks. Equine-man (talk) 21:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I'll try. A bit annoyed here. This was a featured article at one point, but apparently no one even checked the references to see if the info was verifiable. In at least two cases the references are invented, much info was completely incorrect, ect, ect... 2A02:A45D:25BD:1:D8A1:DBCC:9484:4A2C (talk) 21:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Yup, annoying I would agree, just didn’t want you to fall foul of the rules as you have obviously a great deal of knowledge in this subject. Regards, Equine-man (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm calling the info bullshit, not a person, and Wikipedia is not PG-13, so technically I'm not crossing the line, but okay. The thing is (I haven't looked to see how bad it is to save myself the torture, but this is not the first I've corrected) pretty much all the iguana articles are afflicted by this ... not very intellectually honest guy, and the misinfo has been here for over a decade, many even being given high assessments. The misinfo flows from here elsewhere, and this article can end up circular quoting. If you wanna write about iguanas, at least try to do your best, don't fabricate BS and cloth it with false references to fool people! Sorting out a single article is quite a pain ... I don't have access to some references ... and some info looks questionable, for example the nematodes helping digest cellulose -I've never heard of that before. ...let me check if this is even a thing... 2A02:A45D:25BD:1:D8A1:DBCC:9484:4A2C (talk) 22:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, this seems correct.2A02:A45D:25BD:1:D8A1:DBCC:9484:4A2C (talk) 22:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)