User talk:2A02:A460:2634:1:8F90:ADEB:7D4:4721

July 2024
Hello, I'm Macaddct1984. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Lea DeLaria was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 21:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Lea DeLaria shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


 * We keep saying "use the talk page", and it really would be a better move for you. Here's a link to the discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Usage of The Daily Mail as a source
Hello, you're already in violation of the WP:3RR, but just to be clear: as of 2022, The Daily Mail is what is considered a deprecated source and its citation is "generally prohibited". Please see its entry on the list of perennial sources. Even if there was a more reliable source, the content itself generally sufferers from recentism and it's particularly not appropriate for the lead of an article. -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 21:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC)