User talk:2A02:AA13:6201:7F00:8152:C59A:7E72:E2D3

January 2021
Hello, I'm Perryprog. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Game Night (web series)—has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. Perryprog (talk) 18:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Zhivko Atanasov, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Perryprog (talk) 18:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Collapsology, you may be blocked from editing.   WhoAteMyButter ( 📨 │ 📝 ) 19:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Accusations of vandalism and unjustified reversions
Hi; I've noticed you've been rapidly reverting many edits by with an edit summary of "und[oing] vandalism" or "rv unsourced". This doesn't seem to be the case for any of these edits, so I'm not sure what your intention is here. Please keep in mind that this type of editing could be considered disruptive editing, and is not permitted on Wikipedia. Perryprog (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
See WP:BRD. If someone questions the validity of a contribution you've made to an article, such as Collapsology, you need to seek consensus for your addition on the article's talk page rather than restoring it. Continuing to make additions to articles after they've been disputed is considered disruptive editing. Largoplazo (talk) 18:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC)